Hubstaff vs Asrify:
Monitoring vs Trust
Two different approaches to remote team management. Hubstaff monitors employees with screenshots and activity tracking. Asrify trusts employees and focuses on collaboration tools. Which philosophy fits your team?
Quick Verdict
Organizations that require strict employee monitoring, field service companies needing GPS tracking, or businesses with compliance requirements for activity documentation.
Knowledge work teams who value trust, agencies wanting project management with time tracking, and organizations that believe productivity comes from good tools, not surveillance.
Our Recommendation
If your management philosophy centers on trust and collaboration, Asrify is the clear choice. If you require surveillance features for compliance or trust issues, Hubstaff provides those capabilities. Consider the impact on team culture when making your decision.
Company Overview
Hubstaff
Hubstaff is a workforce management platform founded in 2012 that emphasizes employee monitoring. It offers time tracking with screenshots, activity levels, app/URL tracking, and GPS location monitoring. It's positioned as a solution for managing remote workers with visibility into their activities.
Asrify
Asrify is an all-in-one workspace that combines project management, time tracking, team chat, and invoicing without any monitoring features. It's built on the philosophy that trust and good collaboration tools lead to better productivity than surveillance.
Pricing Comparison
Hubstaff's pricing starts lower at $4.99/user but useful features require the Team tier ($10/user) or higher. Asrify's Pro plan at $5.83/user includes all features including project management and team chat that Hubstaff doesn't offer.
| Team Size / Billing | Hubstaff | Asrify | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 users, Starter tier | $24.95/mo | $29.15/mo (Pro) | -$4.20/mo* |
| 5 users, Team tier | $50/mo | $29.15/mo (Pro) | $20.85/mo |
| 10 users, Team tier | $100/mo | $58.30/mo (Pro) | $41.70/mo |
| 10 users, yearly | $1,200/yr (Team) | $699.60/yr (Pro) | $500.40/yr |
| 25 users, Team tier | $250/mo | $145.75/mo (Pro) | $104.25/mo |
* Prices based on publicly available pricing as of 2026. Actual costs may vary based on features, add-ons, and promotional offers.
Hubstaff vs Asrify: Feature Comparison
| Feature | Hubstaff | Asrify |
|---|---|---|
| Core Features | ||
| Time Tracking | Full | Full |
| Automatic Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| Project Management | Basic | Full |
| Kanban Boards | ✗ | ✓ |
| Gantt/Timeline View | ✗ | ✓ |
| Collaboration | ||
| Team Chat | ✗ | ✓ |
| Knowledge Base | ✗ | ✓ |
| Client Portal | ✗ | ✓ |
| Billing & Invoicing | ||
| Invoicing | Team+ | Full |
| Multi-Currency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Payroll | ✓ | ✗ |
| Other Features | ||
| Screenshot Monitoring | ✓ | ✗ |
| Activity Levels | ✓ | ✗ |
| App/URL Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| GPS Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| Privacy-Focused | ✗ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons Comparison
Hubstaff
Pros
- Comprehensive employee monitoring
- GPS tracking for field workers
- Screenshot and activity capture
- Built-in payroll processing
- Geofencing capabilities
- Detailed productivity analytics
- Good for compliance needs
Cons
- Monitoring can damage team trust
- May cause employee anxiety
- No built-in project management
- No team chat or messaging
- No knowledge base
- Complex pricing structure
- Privacy concerns for employees
Asrify
Pros
- Trust-based, no surveillance
- Complete project management
- Built-in team chat
- Knowledge base included
- Kanban and timeline views
- Better for team morale
- Simpler, transparent pricing
Cons
- No monitoring features
- No GPS tracking
- No payroll processing
- Mobile apps coming soon
- Not suitable for compliance monitoring
- No automatic time capture
The Bottom Line: Philosophy Matters
This comparison is less about features and more about management philosophy. Hubstaff assumes employees need to be watched to be productive. Asrify assumes employees perform best when trusted and given great tools. Research increasingly supports trust-based approaches for knowledge work, showing higher productivity, satisfaction, and retention. However, some industries genuinely require monitoring for compliance or safety reasons.
Choose Hubstaff if:
- You have regulatory compliance monitoring requirements
- GPS tracking is essential for field service work
- You've had serious trust issues with remote workers
- Activity documentation is legally required
- Payroll integration is critical to your workflow
Choose Asrify if:
- You believe trust improves productivity
- Your team resents being monitored
- Project management is as important as time tracking
- Team morale and retention matter
- You want collaboration tools, not surveillance
Frequently Asked Questions
Asrify tracks time through task completion and self-reporting without capturing screenshots or monitoring applications. This approach respects privacy while still providing time and productivity data.
We believe surveillance-based management is counterproductive for knowledge work. Research shows that monitoring can increase stress, decrease creativity, and lead to employees gaming the system rather than working effectively.
It depends on your philosophy. If you believe remote workers need surveillance, Hubstaff provides those tools. If you believe remote workers thrive with trust and good collaboration tools, Asrify is the better choice.
Time theft is usually a management problem, not a technology problem. Teams with clear expectations, good communication, and meaningful work rarely have time tracking issues. Asrify's project management tools make work visible without invasive monitoring.
Studies show mixed results. While monitoring may reduce time theft, it often decreases creativity, increases stress, and leads to employee turnover. For knowledge work, trust-based approaches typically yield better long-term results.
Both offer free trials. We encourage you to try both and see how your team responds. Pay attention not just to the features, but to how team members feel about each approach.
Ready for Trust-Based Productivity?
Give your team the tools they need to succeed without watching over their shoulder. Try Asrify's collaborative approach.