Three-Way Comparison

Toggl vs Hubstaff vs Asrify:
Team Time Tracking Showdown

Simple and elegant, surveillance-capable, or complete workspace? Three different philosophies for tracking team time.

Quick Overview

Teams comparing simple tracking with monitoring tools, evaluating whether they need surveillance features or prefer trust-based approaches.

Toggl Track

Simple, intuitive time tracking

Starting at Free / $9/user

Hubstaff

Remote team monitoring

Starting at Free / $4.99/user

Asrify

Complete workspace with PM + invoicing

Starting at Free / $5.83/user

Pricing Comparison

Hubstaff is cheapest for basic plans. Toggl charges more for its polished experience. Asrify sits in the middle but includes PM, chat, and invoicing that neither competitor offers.

Team Size / BillingToggl TrackHubstaffAsrify
5 users, basic$45/mo (Starter)$34.95/mo (Pro)$29.15/mo (Pro)
10 users, standard$90/mo (Starter)$69.90/mo (Pro)$58.30/mo (Pro)
10 users + monitoring/invoicing$90/mo + invoicing app$99.90/mo (Pro+)$58.30/mo (invoicing included)

* Prices based on publicly available pricing as of 2026. Actual costs may vary based on features, add-ons, and promotional offers.

Toggl Track vs Asrify: Feature Comparison

FeatureToggl TrackHubstaffAsrify
Core Features
Time TrackingFullFullFull
Project ManagementBasicBasicFull
Kanban Boards
Collaboration
Team Chat
Billing & Invoicing
InvoicingBasicFull
Other Features
Employee Monitoring
Screenshots
GPS Tracking
Integrations100+30+Growing
Free Plan5 users1 user2 users

Who Should Choose What?

Choose Toggl Track if:

  • You only need simple time tracking
  • Polished UX is a priority
  • You have other tools for PM/billing
  • You want extensive integrations
  • You have a small team

Choose Hubstaff if:

  • You need employee monitoring
  • GPS tracking for field work
  • Screenshot proof is required
  • You manage remote contractors
  • Payroll integration matters

Choose Asrify if:

  • You want a complete workspace
  • Project management is important
  • You need invoicing
  • Trust-based tracking fits your culture
  • You're an agency or consultancy

Frequently Asked Questions

Not usually. Research shows trust-based management produces better results for knowledge work. Monitoring is mainly useful for compliance requirements or specific contractor situations.

Toggl is known for its polished, simple interface. Asrify focuses on clean design. Hubstaff prioritizes functionality over elegance.

Only Asrify has full native invoicing. Hubstaff has basic invoicing. Toggl has no invoicing - you need a separate tool.

Asrify scales well with its complete feature set. Toggl is simple but may require additional tools. Hubstaff gets expensive at scale with per-user monitoring costs.

Employees generally prefer non-monitoring tools. Toggl and Asrify are trust-based. Hubstaff's monitoring features can affect morale.

Get Team Tracking Without Surveillance

Track time, manage projects, and invoice clients - all without monitoring your team.